Court & Justice System Timeline
The following information is provided for educational and public-interest purposes to document verified incidents of identity theft, financial exploitation, and related misconduct that affected my livelihood and property. All material is based on verifiable records, including emails, legal correspondence, and financial documentation.
Authorities and Resources Contacted
Pattern of Obstruction
Impact on Victim (Chalise Monique Mapp)
DISCLAIMER: This timeline documents Chalise Monique Mapp’s repeated efforts to obtain justice through official and legal channels, all of which resulted in obstruction, negligence, or deliberate suppression of evidence. Despite reaching out to multiple agencies and individuals within and around the justice system, accountability remains absent.
Authorities and Resources Contacted
1. Police Departments (Trenton & Surrounding Jurisdictions)
Reports filed regarding harassment, stalking, and property interference.
Officers repeatedly minimized or dismissed claims despite photographic, digital, and recorded evidence.
Failure to investigate credible threats or attempted kidnapping incidents.
2. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Contact made regarding identity theft, false guardianship filings, and coordinated cyber intrusion.
Provided details linking government employees and law enforcement to the abuse.
No follow-up or investigation was initiated despite documentation and verified leads.
3. Lawyers (Private and Court-Appointed)
Multiple attorneys retained for civil, defamation, and property-related claims.
Some delayed filings, failed to present key evidence, or appeared to coordinate with opposing parties.
Requests for accountability and professional review ignored or deflected.
4. Princeton University Resources
Contacted IT specialists, cybersecurity experts, and Human Rights Advocates.
Provided evidence of digital interference, identity theft, and intellectual property exploitation.
University staff declined to intervene or investigate fully, citing “outside jurisdiction.”
5. City of Trenton Courts
Attempted filings for restraining orders, harassment, and stalking charges.
Staff improperly rejected filings or created procedural barriers not applied to other citizens.
Evidence of internal bias and potential coordination with named abusers.
6. Superior Court of New Jersey (Family & Civil Divisions)
Filed multiple cases for harassment, property interference, and defamation.
Judges and clerks repeatedly delayed hearings, lost paperwork, or denied motions without review.
Ombudsman assistance occasionally helpful, but outcomes stalled by judicial obstruction.
7. City of Trenton Mayoral Office / Mayoral Aide
Contacted for intervention regarding systemic abuse and city-wide negligence.
Communications received but ignored or rerouted to departments already involved in misconduct.
8. Private Investigator
Hired to trace false guardianship filings, fraudulent addresses, and identity misuse.
Preliminary findings confirmed cross-state fraud involving Florida and New Jersey.
Investigator later obstructed by uncooperative agencies or individuals with government ties.
9. Marlon Webb & David Webb (Civilians with Institutional Connections)
Contacted for information or accountability due to their proximity to ongoing crimes and relationships with abusers.
Refused cooperation and displayed defensive, contradictory behavior consistent with cover-up involvement.
Pattern of Obstruction
Consistent delay, diversion, and deflection across agencies and officials.
Repeated mislabeling of victim as “mentally unstable” to invalidate credible reports.
Involuntary detainment used as a tool of intimidation and discrediting.
Favoritism and institutional protection extended toward the abusers and their enablers.
Impact on Victim (Chalise Monique Mapp)
Prolonged psychological and emotional harm due to state-enabled neglect.
Financial loss from identity theft, legal sabotage, and property damage.
Ongoing physical danger from unaddressed threats and coordinated harassment.
Forced to self-document and publicize evidence due to lack of legitimate recourse.
Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer
The following material is presented for educational, journalistic, and evidentiary purposes only. All names, email addresses, and communications shown appear solely to verify incidents of identity theft, fraud, and related misconduct. This publication does not encourage contact, harassment, or retaliation toward any person named.
Information is reproduced from existing records, emails, and correspondence that form part of ongoing documentation submitted to legal and investigative authorities. Statements are based on verifiable evidence and are made in good-faith reporting to protect the public and defend my livelihood. Personal addresses, phone numbers, or unrelated private details have been redacted where possible to preserve privacy.